Catalan speaker Carme Forcadell
Carme Forcadell was elected president of the Parliament of Catalonia on 26 October 2015 and held office until 27 October 2017, when she was forced to resign after the Spanish Senate suspended the autonomy of Catalonia. She has been in custody for more than 2 years now, accused of a crime of rebellion for which she is asked for up to 15 years in prison.
Prior to being elected president of the Parliament as a member of the coalition Junts pel Sí, Carme Forcadell had been the president of the proindependence organization Assemblea Nacional Catalana (ANC). Under her presidency, the ANC organized the great demonstrations of September 11, and the association became an important asset of Catalan politics.
As president of the Parliament, Forcadell presided over the parliamentary debates that would give rise to the Referendum Law and the Legal Transitory Law, which had to give legal coverage to the holding of the referendum on 1 October and the subsequent application of the results. On 27 October, Forcadell presided over the plenary that approved the declaration of independence. This statement was never published in the official journals, so it has never produced any legal effects.
On that same day, the Spanish Senate, at the request of the Spanish government, agreed to the application of article 155 of the Constitution to dissolve the parliament of Catalonia and to dismiss the highest public officers of the government. Forcadell was stopped as the president of the Parliament.
On 30 October 2017, the Attorney General filed a lawsuit against Carme Forcadell and the rest of the members of the parliamentary board who had allowed, with their votes, the processing of the declaration of independence.
On 9 November, the Supreme Court decreed a € 250.000 bail for Carme Forcadell. The president of the parliament spent one night in the Madrid prison of Alcalá Meco, and the following day the solidarity box promoted by the independentist organizations paid the bail. The other members of the board were released, with lower bails as the only precautionary measure. Joan Josep Nuet was an exception, as he was not imposed any precautionary measure with the argument that, although the facts were the same as those of his colleagues, Nuet was not in favor of independence.
In December of that same year, Carme Forcadell was elected a member of the Parliament of Catalonia for the candidature of Esquerra Republicana de Catalunya. On 22 March, one day before attending the Supreme Court, Carme Forcadell resigned as a member of the Parliament because she did not want “her personal situation to be an obstacle to the sovereignty of the Parliament”.
On 23 March, Forcadell – along with the rest of the defendants – traveled to Madrid to attend the act of notification of the prosecution. The judge Pablo Llarena decided to prosecute the president of the Parliament for a rebellion crime with the argument that Forcadell had allowed the parliamentary debates that would lead to the referendum and the statement about the independence. The truth is that the rebellion crime, as drafted in the Criminal Code, demands that there has been a “violent uprising”, and Llarena does not argue that this violence has existed in real terms in the investigated events.
The same day, Pablo Llarena decreed preventive prison without bail for Carme Forcadell, along with the former ministers Jordi Turull, Josep Rull, Raül Romeva and Dolors Bassa. Former vicepresident Oriol Junqueras, the former minister Joaquim Forn and the social leaders Jordi Sànchez and Jordi Cuixart were already in jail.
The resolution that dictates the imprisonment of Carme Forcadell says that there is a risk of escape because the possible penalties to which they are confronted are very high. It also argues that other defendants have left the country, and thus it transfers the consequences of acts of third parties to the defendants who always attended the court. The resolution also says that there is a risk of criminal reiteration, although Forcadell had already resigned as an MP.
The prosecution of Carme Forcadell is a violation of the right to self-determination of peoples, enshrined in article 1 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. It also constitutes an attack on freedom of thought, expression and assembly, rights that are also protected by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the European Convention on Human Rights. A paradigmatic example of the attack on freedom of thought is the fact that the Supreme Court agreed to the release without precautionary measures of Joan Josep Nuet simply because he was not a pro-independence politician, although the facts were exactly the same as those of the rest of his colleagues from the parliament board.
On the other hand, the preventive prison of Carme Forcadell contravenes the right to presumption of innocence and supposes an attack on the right to freedom and security.
The appeal of the preventive prision of Carme Forcadell has been lying on the table of the Constitutional Court for more than one year. At the moment, the Spanish institutions are adopting an obstruction attitude with respect to the procedures of the political prisoners in order to avoid that they can go to international bodies.
Carme Forcadell, Speaker of the Catalan Parliament / Jordi Borràs
International report of International Trial Watch (in English)