Jordi Sànchez, pacifist social leader, accused of violent rebellion.
Social leader and candidate to the Presidency of the Catalan Government Jordi Sànchez under pre-trial detention.
“According to the judge I am indirectly responsible for a violence, that in spite of never having existed, he says that I imagined and assumed it as unavoidable. It looks like a joke but it is not.”
Jordi Sànchez i Picanyol, a social leader and former deputy Ombudsman, was the President of the Catalan National Assembly (ANC) at the moment of his detention. He was charged with sedition in connection with the events of September 20 (see section “Before” and the video), which the Public Prosecutor began to investigate on 22nd September. He was later detained after being summoned to the National Court in Madrid on October 16, alongside Mr. Jordi Cuixart. His challenge to the court’s jurisdiction (like any citizen, he has a right to be tried by his court of first instance), as well as all the appeals filed against the committal order, pre-trial detention, etc., have all been dismissed.
After the 21 December 2017 Catalan elections – enforced by the Spanish prime minister Mr. Mariano Rajoy (who imposed direct rule by Madrid, by means of a stongly contested application of aticle 155 of the Spanish Constitution on October 27) – Mr. Carles Puigdemont (former Catalan President who headed the pro-independence party Junts Per Catalunya) won and was proposed as the candidate to the Presidency of Catalonia’s Government.
Spain did not allow Mr. Puigdemont – who by then was exiled in Belgium – to exercise his right of political representation from abroad. Using an unprecedented cautionary manoeuvre by the Constitutional Court so that another candidate had to be put forward, Mr. Jordi Sanchez (No. 2 on the same list) was then proposed as candidate to the Presidency of Catalonia’s Government on 6 March 2018. However, the Constitutional Court blocked its investiture too (on two occasions), with the help of pro-Spanish parties. The court argued that freeing Mr. Sànchez from prison would have implied “a big risk of commiting a crime again”.
On the 21st March he filed a claim to the UN Human Rights Committee, where he asked for interim measures to be able to exercise his political rights. On the 23rd March, the Human Rights Committee admitted Mr. Sànchez’ case and accepted the interim measures, asking Spain to comply with them. Spain did not follow the UN Committee request and did not permit Mr. Sànchez to take part in the vote for the Presidency of Catalonia in the Catalan Parliament.
On September 20, the Spanish Police arrived to the premises of several Catalan Governmental Institutions, searching them and detaining public civil servants and high rank officials. Thousands of citizens gathered in front of the places where searches were taking place, in support of the Catalan Institutions and of the Referendum of Independence (that was to be held on October 1). The biggest concentration (up to 40,000 people) was in front of the Department of Economy and Finance. One of the many social, civic and political leaders that went there was Jordi Sànchez. Together with Jordi Cuixart (the leader of the cultural NGO Òmnium Cultural) – he tried to prevent any violent incidents from taking place and asked people to keep calm and to go back home before midnight. This was in order to let police and judicial officers to leave the premises as soon as they finished their jobs.
Having turned down the option to park inside the Ministry premises, Spanish police had parked their cars outside the building. The vehicles were left unlocked, unattended and with visible weapons inside. However, they did not accept the invitations made by the Catalan police to enable them to leave through a secure passage (as the court secretary did), but no significant incidents took place during the hours in which the search lasted.
Today Mr. Jordi Sànchez, together with 9 other social and political Catalan leaders, remains in jail on pretrial detention. They are being held for evidence that many say does not match the crime they are accused of.
Mr. Sànchez was democratically elected as number 2 of the Junts Per Catalunya list by Catalan citizens on the 21D Election, imposed by the Spanish Government under direct rule. However, he was not allowed to exercise his political rights. Spain continues to bypass the United Nations human rights organizations’ recommendations. This was a repeat of what it did before and after the 1st October 2017, when it refused to comply with interim measures accepted by the Human Rights Committee regarding Jordi Sanchez’s communication, as requested by the Committee to Spain.
Still in pre-trial detention more than one year after his arrest, Spain’s Supreme Court has vetoed the access of all appeals for protection of his constitutional rights filed by Mr. Sànchez to European justice by systematically accepting all of them, to be later shelved and unresolved. This has been denounced by a manifesto (see below) signed by Mr. Jordi Sànchez and Mr. Jordi Turull (the spokesperson of the Catalan Government dismissed by the Spanish State after the Declaration of Independence by the Catalan Parliament on 27 October 2017).
Both politicians started a hunger strike on 1st December 2018 in order to ‘raise awareness’ of unfair treatment by Spain and to denounce the attempts of Spanish courts to block their access to European justice. Their hunger strike ended on 20th December. Both Mr. Sànchez and Mr. Turull considered its aims reached as the Spanish Constitutional Court stopped its blockade to appeals for protection of constitutional rights eventually reaching European justice.
On 21st January 2019, PEN International denounced the excessive restrictions on the right to freedom of expression as a result of the disproportionate charges of rebellion and sedition filed against writers and civil society leaders Jordi Cuixart and Jordi Sànchez. The pair have been held in pre-trial detention for over a year for having peacefully expressed their political views.
On the 29th May 2019, the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention – overseen by the United Nations Human Rights Council – released an opinion on the pretrial detention of Catalan leaders Oriol Junqueras, Jordi Sànchez and Jordi Cuixart. They concluded it to have been arbitrary and calling on the Spanish government to “adopt the necessary measures to remedy the situation […] without delay”. They go on to suggest that “the appropriate remedy would be to immediately release” the three.
Spain is violating the principle that pretrial detention is a measure of last resort and it should, therefore, be applied only exceptionally.
Spain has neither respected the principle that prisoners should be in prisons close to their domiciles and families at least until the direct rule main responsible, the Partido Popular, has finally been ousted from power. Mr. Sanchez and the other prisoners were more than 500 kilometres far from home for more than eight months.
Based on good faith, state parties to any Human Rights Convention should feel bound to comply with their bodies’ recommendations, even if they are not binding. The Human Rights’ Committee will take into account the State’s answer.
Spain is violating the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and other Conventions connected.
Several United Nations human rights bodies have warned Spain many times, like, for instance, the UN special rapporteur on freedom of opinion and expression, the UN Special Rapporteur on the right to peaceful assembly and association or the High Commissioner of Human Rights in his speech on the 7th March 2018 before the Human Rights Council when he said “I remind the authorities (of Spain) that pre-trial detention should be considered a measure of last resort. I encourage resolution of this situation through political dialogue”.
U.N. report that calls for immediate release of three Catalan political prisoners, including Jordi Sànchez
PEN International statement on the imprisoned Catalan writers and Civil society leaders
- 20 of the Spanish Constitution article which regulates the protection of freedom of expression in Spain (in English).
- European Convention of Human Rights, arts. 10 and 11, on freedom of expression and to peaceful assembly (in English).
- 19, 20, 21 Universal Declaration on Human Rights, regarding freedom of opinion and expression, right to peaceful assembly, right to participate in political life. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/UDHR/Documents/UDHR_Translations/eng.pdf
- ( 9.3, 19, 21, 25) International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights regarding pre-trial detention, freedom of opinion and expression, freedom of peaceful assembly, right to participate in political life.https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx
- Hunger Strike Manifesto:
The blockade of European justice that the Constitutional Court imposes upon us. Timely access to the courts without delay or unnecessary obstacles is a right that every person has. Failure to exercise this right with full guarantees and in fair conditions can lead to irreparable damages and damages to fundamental rights.
The cause investigated by the Spanish State on the Referendum of October 1, evidences a lot of affectations on our fundamental rights, including the presumption of innocence, freedom, political rights and the rule of law, a judicial process with all due guarantees. The violations of the European Convention on Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights are quite prominent in many of the resolutions that both the Supreme Court and the National Court have issued against us since October 16, 2017, when the first pre-trial detention orders were issued.
Our determination to have a fair, lawful trial is stronger than ever. We have not ceased to appeal all those violations of our rights that the Spanish courts have committed. But it is the international courts, and in particular the European Court of Human Rights, where today we deposit the trust to get justice.
The Constitutional Court (CC), however, blocks our access to European justice. The action of the CC is as simple as blatant: to accept 100% of our appeals for constitutional protection of fundamental rights, to be processed later on in order not to resolve any of them.
According to official data of the CC, the accepted number of appeals ranged between 1% and 1.5% of the total number of those presented. In our case, they are filed 100%, then forgotten in a drawer. The Spanish legislation (Criminal Procedure Act) and the doctrine of the same Constitutional Court, stipulate that the appeals against pre-trial detention orders must enjoy preferential processing and must be resolved within a maximum period of 30 days. The first appeal for constitutional protection of our fundamental rights, accepted by the Constitutional Court against the pre-trial detention order decreed by the National Court, was filed on November 22, 2017, more than 365 days ago. An unjustified delay, and more so if we keep in mind the records of quick resolutions resolved by the Constitutional Court in several occasions, where it has met even on a weekend and only 24 hours after its intervention has been requested.
We ask for an impartial and diligent Constitutional Court, which should not impede the exercise of our rights. We denounce the blockade that the Spanish Constitutional Court de facto imposes upon us to access the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). We reaffirm our determination, in accordance with the European Convention on Human Rights, to fully exercise our defence rights. We will never give up on our right to a fair trial.
We do not ask the Constitutional Court for any treatment of favour. But we do not passively accept any discrimination or unwarranted procrastination. The question is not even that the Court would rule in our favour, but simply that the appeals presented would be unblocked (by being not admitted or by simply being rejected). Only in this way, will the road to access European justice be opened to us. We are well aware that the longer it takes for us to access the European Court of Human Rights, regaining our freedom will take longer as well.
We denounce the blockade of European justice imposed on us by the Constitutional Court. And we do so with all the strength and dignity of a line of political action strongly rooted in nonviolence. Thus, we will resort to one of the few legitimate forms of protest that being imprisoned allows us; by conducting a hunger strike.
We will not do it against anyone, but in favour of creating awareness and fostering action to prevent the acceptance of something that is not normal as normal. The irregular functioning of the Constitutional Court is of severe seriousness in a State of Law. And that must appeal to all democrats, whichever their political choices are.
We ask for the attention and support of all the democratic people of Catalonia, Spain, Europe, and the World. We invite you to preserve the civic and peaceful attitude that has made us so strong over these years. We urge the “Smile Revolution” to flourish through events that will continue to be celebrated in Catalonia in the form of concentrations, “yellow dinners”, and concerts in the coming days and weeks. And we also ask for our hunger strike not to alter the spirit or celebration that these dates, close to Christmas and New Year’s Eve, bring to the majority of us.
We are grateful, finally, for the solidarity of all women and men who feel called and committed to the effective defence of rights and freedoms, personal and collective.
Together for dignity and until freedom is reached!
Jordi Sànchez and Jordi Turull
Lledoners, December 1, 2018